I've been watching this particular fiasco evolve on the climateaudit.org blog run by Steve McIntyre. His primary claim to fame is a math and statistical background that he's applying to the statistics and formulae behind AGW "conventional wisdom." He's been attempting to get raw data that by any scientific standards he should be able to--in order to confirm or debunk the claims made based on said data. The appearance of this story in The Register--while not exactly the NYT--indicates a wider awareness of CRU's shenannigans.
This is exactly the kind of nonsense that leads me--and similar AGW agnostics--to question "conventional wisdom." What, exactly, are they hiding? And why?
Posted using ShareThis
No comments:
Post a Comment